Lizzyfied

Posts by this author:

A letter to my future self

Ten years from now you will be 35 years old. Hello future me. How are you? Is life treating you well?

View Post

I gave away money without knowing if it will do good

Let me start this post with a disclaimer. The intent of writing this blog is not to brag about my charitable donation. (Trust me, it is nothing to brag about and there are plenty of people who donate or volunteer more). Rather, I want to shed some light on a type of charity I strongly believe in. A form of donating that is sometimes frowned upon and remains a bit of a mystery. A type of giving that ask nothing in return from the receiver. And therefore, a type of giving that has the potential to fund people’s drug and alcohol addiction. Yet, also a type of giving that has the potential to eradicate global poverty within our lifetime. In a nutshell, it is the concept of giving money to the poor without any conditions. Let me explain.

Idealistic student

During my Master’s degree I had a module on ecological economics. In this class, we explored different alternative economic systems. System that wouldn’t exploit the finite resources on our planet. Systems that centred around human and ecological wellbeing rather than consumerism. And even systems that would shrink our economies rather than grow them. It was by far the most interesting module during my entire school career. It was also this module that introduced me to the concept of a Universal Basic Income. I became mesmerised by this concept and have been reading books and studies on this topic ever since.

Universal Basic Income

The Universal Basic Income is a concept that aims to give every person on this planet a liveable wage. Rich or poor, the Universal Basic Income doesn’t put any conditions on who receives the money. It also doesn’t put any restrictions on how people should spend this money. How does giving money to the rich solve world poverty, you ask? Two reasons really. A 10th of the world’s population lives in extreme poverty. Government and aid organisations have developed increasingly complex systems to help the poor. Most of the money in these systems never actually reaches the poor. It would take about $80 billion a year to eradicate poverty using the Universal Basic Income. This sounds like a lot. But it is only half of what we spend yearly on global aid for the poor. So, in essence, the Universal Basic Income aims to be more efficient and direct about solving poverty using a lot less money. It aims to help the poor by simply taking away their poorness.

A big experiment

There is a lot of evidence that Universal Basic Income could work (a lot better than for example microloans). A nice beginner’s book on this topic is “Utopia for Realists” by Rutger Bregman. Or you can check all the scientific studies on this reference list. (One interesting study found that poverty decreases cognitive function. The cognitive function increases immediately after the person stops being poor.) The evidence in these sources shows that free and unconditional cash transfers have long-lasting benefits on poor people and don’t lead to the consumption of alcohol or drugs. So far, the Universal Basic Income sounds incredibly promising. The only problem is that these studies were either really small or referring to other forms of cash transfers. There has never been a large-scale study on the Universal Basic Income. And although the theory all adds up, we don’t really know if it will work until we try it.

It exists

As I was looking into charities to give to during the festive period, I checked my go-to source ‘The Life You Can Save’.  This non-profit was founded by the philosopher Peter Singer. The organisation draws up lists of charities that are truly effective in fighting extreme poverty or suffering. When charities are run like a business, with big marketing departments and fat bonuses for the CEOs they don’t make the cut on their list. I really recommend having a look at their listed charities. (I promise, none of the others are experimental in their effectiveness). It was on this website that I bumped into GiveDirectly. This charity gives unconditional money up to living wage (basically a Universal Basic Income) to the poorest people and refugees in Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda. Just $25 could provide a person in Kenya with a one month living wage. I was so excited that GiveDirectly was putting into practice, what I had read about for so long. GiveDirectly has rigorous reporting on the effectiveness of its trial, that is independently verified by a third-party charity. So, we will all be able to read about the effects of the trial in their reports and publications.

I donated to the cause and subscribed to the e-mail list to stay up-to-date on their findings. Giving to charity is incredibly exciting when you are invited to read about the effects. There is a chance this experiment could fail (although so far, all the results are positive), but I am incredibly chuffed for the possibility that it won’t.

Do you have a charity you would recommend?

Is blogging even sustainable?

A while ago blogging was announced dead. This proclamation related to the decrease in marketing spending on blogs in favour of other platforms, such as podcasts, Instagram and YouTube. The marketing budgets might have gone down, but the influence bloggers have on their readership is bigger than ever. This is particularly true in the space of the sustainability sector. Lifestyle bloggers all over the world take the complexity of sustainability issues and translate them into simple everyday practices. In fact, the blogosphere has been called the fastest growing source for environmental information. But is it really that simple? Is blogging really a force for good in the fight against environmental degradation. Or are we all just kidding ourselves?

The Good 

As I began to research this topic I wanted to start with the positives. And I was happy to find that the work had been done for me. A 2018 scientific paper explored the positive impacts of personal blogs on environmental communication. (Yes, someone did a scientific study on bloggers!) The study lauded sustainability bloggers on their reinforcement of the individualization of responsibility. These bloggers show us how we can make practical changes in our lives that do good on the environment. From zero-waste bloggers and vegan recipe creators to minimalists and clean beauty guru’s, the blogging sphere has a wealth of knowledge for self-governed sustainability. It is through these blogs that I started my own sustainability journey. And after several university degrees on environmental sustainability I still believe that the small personal changes advocated by bloggers are the most crucial ones for change. So far, so good.

The Bad

The actual content of sustainability blogs is to be encouraged. Their medium is wanting. That medium is of course the internet. We often talk about the internet as ‘a cloud’, as if all the trillions of memes, videos and articles are floating somewhere in space. But in reality, they are stored in massive data centres that use up a whole lot of energy. And on the other side, there are all the internet consumers that use their increasingly smart – but also energy-intensive – devices. In 2018 the amount of global internet users increased by 7%. It was also the first year where the total amount of internet users surpassed the 4 billion mark. Without increased efficiency or a switch to renewable energy by the IT-industry, researchers have estimated the internet could create 14% of global greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. If that doesn’t sound too bad, it is. When the Gangnam Style video went viral in 2012, it was watched 3 billion times. Those 3 billion views together emitted as much CO2-emmissions as when 313.000 passengers fly from Amsterdam to Bangkok. 14% is bad.

The Solution

The internet is not all bad news. Big internet companies, such as Google, are increasingly using renewable energy to power their data centers. In fact, Google is much more sustainable than the popular sustainability search engine Ecosia. This search engine plants trees for every search people make but is hosted by Bing. Since Bing does not have great sustainability credentials, Ecosia’s net emissions are actually worse than Google’s. Google is really pushing the frontiers of sustainable internet. So step one is too use sustainable internet services. (Check this list for a sustainability ranking of the most used internet services). Bloggers can make their blogs sustainable by using a smart design that features darker colours. (Note to self: redesign the white blog layout.)

We can also become more mindful, both as creators and consumers. As consumers, we can do social media detoxes or shut off our electronic devices entirely for a weekend . Of course, we can also read blogs that push us towards sustainable habits, rather than those that promote heavy consumerism. As creators, we can post only when we feel proud to share our articles rather than spewing out thin content to keep the blog busy. I am not saying these solutions are perfect, but they might help.

The internet is truly a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it has empowered people all over the world by supplying access to knowledge at the tip of our fingers. Sustainability would not have been propagated as much on the personal level if it weren’t for bloggers. On the other hand, the internet is one of the most polluting industries in the world. As with anything in sustainability, the issue is complex. All we can do as users is to become more mindful when and what we create and consume on the internet. Let’s all do our bit!